Sunday, July 20, 2008

LINKS to Information: What, Who & WHY we have smoking bans and ‘their’ other upcoming agendas.

* * *
*
There are thousands of links to PROOF and facts behind the smoking bans concerning what, who and why, making it very easy to get lost on the web. This page is some of the better links for information and more will be added.

‘Those that choose to restrict freedoms of and to others deserve NONE for themselves.’

The Johnson and Johnson Company (J&J) formed the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in the 1970’s. Since then, they have purchased all or part of at 250 to 260 PHARMACEUTICAL companies. And now the fact of deceit continues …..

FACT:
All in the same FOOD group, all in the nightshade family is BROCCOLI, POTATO, TOBACCO, TOMATO, and GREEN PEPPERS (among others). They ALL contain nicotine. Will all be banned from ‘we the people’ for corporate greed (profits) being taken from us for prescription use as they are trying to do with vitamin and mineral supplements?

* * * LINKS TO INFORMATION

This site is by Marcus (Mark) in Minnesota. He’s been WISE for a while now and he has an excellent site. This is a MUST read for a quick education in easy read form. This is in blog format with daily updates. Highlighted words are links.
- The main page - His story - A must read.
* * *

The financier of the bans:

* * *

The home page of the financier. They have removed a lot of pages due to public outrage of their agendas. They are a PRIVATE organization although they CONTROL our medical industry. They finance the smoking bans by grants to the American Cancer Society, the American Lung Association and the American Heart Association who are ALL PRIVATE organizations. They do NOT tie to our government.

* * *

Johnson & Johnson (J&J who formed the RWJF, aka The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) is offering pharmacists a $10 consultation fee for providing counseling, support and advice to customers on the new Nicorette Active Stop support program. Full article and rumor is the pharmacists in this country are getting kick backs for pushing and selling over the counter no smoke products in this country.

* * *

A wonderful report by Norman Kjono who has been fighting the smoking bans for years. His knowledge is extensive.

* * *

The science. Good and not wordy.

* * *

Ohio Governor Strickland abolishes the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation.
This is BIG news as it puts the money from the Master Settlement Agreement (paid for by tobacco companies) into the states hands for JOBS and state improvements while it stops the waste with it all going to no-smoke programs. Scroll to May 6, 2008.
* * *

A library of information: Anything you can think of is here.

* * *

The alcohol ban will begin OFFICIALLY in 2009:
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Financier of Temperance.
They HAVE announced that the alcohol ban will begin in 2009 (after many bars and various establishments that serve alcohol in ban states have closed).

* * *

The RWJF is behind the national insurance agendas. How great it would be for them to have all prescriptions mandated to them self! From the NY Times this shows how they have politicians in their pocket. Another connected article. An article from the horses mouth.

Not meaning to take political sides, here is more:
[Hillary] Clinton stated in April 1993 that she does not believe people should be permitted to smoke and banned smoking in the White House.

… Democrats steal the future of small bar and tavern owners through mandates that reward pharmaceutical interests.
… Democrats reward big corporate interests and do so at the expense of local mom-and-pop small business owners.
… Democrats pick the pockets of their middle and lower income constituents to add billions to pharmaceutical sales.
… Today’s taxes on smokers are tomorrow’s stealth tax increases for everyone.

* * *

KNOW YOUR ADVERSARIES
The connections are frightening.

* * *

On June 6, 1996, the Regents of the University of Colorado submitted a proposal to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJ) for a grant under the Foundation's "A Matter of Degree" program. The University received $870,269 over 5 years in exchange for using its students, the citizens of Boulder, and the people of Colorado as laboratory rats in a social engineering experiment designed to "change campus culture" and the laws governing alcohol consumption.

Based in Princeton, New Jersey, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is one of the nations 10 largest It awarded almost $300,000,000 in grants in 1997.

Rather than help sick, poor, or unfortunate individuals, RWJ buys government policy. It spent millions to pass the Clinton health care plan, and continues to lavish funds on organizations and state governments willing to work to increase government control of health care. When RWJ decided that substance abuse was a bigger national health problem than cancer, heart disease, stroke, or diabetes, all foundation funding for tobacco control efforts went from $85,000 a year in 1990 to $10.6 million in 1995.

… Spending includes direct support of the Clinton health care plan and direct support of the executive branches of state governments willing to work on implementing Clinton Care in particular states. It also includes funding the push to provide school-based health care centers, "grants" to local organizations who publicly support that agenda, and salaries to put RWJ "scholars" in staff positions in the Senate.

* * *

Did you know there is GOOD in nicotine? Try a Google search and you’ll find mixed in with all of the anti hype that it is good for warding off Alzheimer’s, Dementia, ADD and other medical problems. No wonder the pharmaceutical companies want to OWN it. Check patents too!

* * *

Quitting smoking may be an admirable aim [although based on deceits], but driving honest businesses and local governments into financial ruin is an unacceptable method of achieving it. Illinois Policy Institute.

* * *

Michael J. McFadden has offered us two valuable sources of information about the Antismokers, their movement, and their lies. First of course is his book, Dissecting Antismokers' Brains - Amazon and second is a free, printable booklet specifically designed for quick and easy reading while getting people angry at the lies about the bans. It's called the "Stiletto" and is downloadable from Stilettos, DoDefiance! online These are important and will furnish information you will not find elsewhere.
.
* * *
.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT SUBCOMMITTEE STATEMENT .... Long but worth a good read.
.
* * *
.
Are Diesels More Dangerous than Cigarettes as a Cause of Lung Cancer?
Bear in mind, this report was made before the EPA forced the inclusion of Cigarette Smoke to the Carcinogenic tables, with only their fraudulent report as proof.

* * *

Keep checking back for more links …..

Please visit OpponentsOfOhioBans and support Ohio Senate Bill SB346.
Scroll below for email and snail mail addresses to the Ohio Senate and Congress.

Sign the Petition EVERYONE! National going to Congress.
Please sign if you are against smoking bans!
You have the option to hide your name on line.
... to request a Congressional Hearing into the smoking bans, the junk meta analysis, the Surgeon General cherry picked studies, the BONUS checks, etc. which are outlined in the petition.
Sign - Full verbiage
Note: Pranks ARE Removed Daily.
.
.
***

Saturday, June 28, 2008

OHIO SENATOR & CONGRESS Email Addresses

/.
.
Help build the giant crack in the smoking bans.

SUPPORT Senate Bill, S.B. 346 for Ohio.
This bill was entered June 2008.
A vote is expected in Sept 2008.

Letters are needed to all Senators including those that sponsored S.B. 346 to show they are on the right side! We are fighting for ALL of us! PLEASE WRITE TO ALL !!!

See TWO areas below: 1. Senate. 2. Congress.

Name listing alphabetical in each category
shows the direct email address, their party and district.
Below the names are grouped email addresses for bulk mailings (Bcc).

…………………………………………………………

Ohio SENATE .
For addresses see links.
33 Ohio Senators.
Grouped email addresses show below for bulk mailings (Bcc) .

NAME
PARTY and DISTRICT

Steve Buehrer SD01@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 1st

Gary Cates SD04@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 4th
Is Supporting S.B. 346
(D) 11th

Timothy Grendell SD18@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 18th
Is supporting S.B. 346
(R) 19th
Miller is a Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation board member
who voted to move the Ohio money out of the government's reach.
(D) 23rd

Larry A. Mumper SD26@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 26th

Tom Niehaus sd14@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 14th

Joy Padgett sd20@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 20th

Tom Roberts troberts@maild.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(D) 5th

Tim Schaffer SD31@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 31st

Robert Schuler SD07@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 7th

Bill Seitz sd08@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 8th

Robert F. Spada rspada@mailr.sen.state.oh.us
Signed for S.B. 346
(R) 24th
May be supporting S.B. 346
(R) 16th
George Voinovich
Contact form
(R)

Jason H. Wilson senatorwilson@maild.sen.state.oh.us
(D) 30th


To Ohio SENATE shown above grouped for bulk mailing:

SD22@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd10@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, senatorboccieri@maild.sen.state.oh.us, SD01@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, senatorcafaro@maild.sen.state.oh.us, sd17@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, SD04@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, kcoughli@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, SD12@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, fedoroffice@maild.sen.state.oh.us, dgoodman@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, dgoodman@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, SD19@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, jjacobso@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, Senatorkearney@maild.sen.state.oh.us, senatormason@maild.sen.state.oh.us, SD23@maild.sen.state.oh.us, rmiller@maild.sen.state.oh.us, senatormorano@maild.sen.state.oh.us, mailto:SD26@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd14@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd20@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, troberts@maild.sen.state.oh.us, senatorsawyer@maild.sen.state.oh.us, SD31@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, SD07@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, SD29@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd08@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, senatorsmith@maild.sen.state.oh.us, rspada@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd16@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, sd02@mailr.sen.state.oh.us, senatorwilson@maild.sen.state.oh.us

…………………………………………………………


Ohio REPRESENTATIVES (Congress):
For addresses see links.
Says: 99 representatives.
Grouped email addresses show below for bulk mailings (Bcc) .

NAME
PARTY and DISTRICT

Zehringer, James J. district77@ohr.state.oh.us
Republican 77

Not shown above or below:
HOBSON, Dave who will step down at end of term in 2009. No direct email address found.
See on line form.

To House of Representatives shown above grouped for bulk mailing:

district78@ohr.state.oh.us, district94@ohr.state.oh.us, district21@ohr.state.oh.us, district69@ohr.state.oh.us, district27@ohr.state.oh.us, district29@ohr.state.oh.us, district01@ohr.state.oh.us, district89@ohr.state.oh.us, district09@ohr.state.oh.us, district16@ohr.state.oh.us, district34@ohr.state.oh.us, district48@ohr.state.oh.us, district88@ohr.state.oh.us, district08@ohr.state.oh.us, district03@ohr.state.oh.us, district24@ohr.state.oh.us, district68@ohr.state.oh.us, district55@ohr.state.oh.us, district90@ohr.state.oh.us, district54@ohr.state.oh.us, district83@ohr.state.oh.us, district86@ohr.state.oh.us, district12@ohr.state.oh.us, district15@ohr.state.oh.us, district70@ohr.state.oh.us, district91@ohr.state.oh.us, district98@ohr.state.oh.us, district95@ohr.state.oh.us, district31@ohr.state.oh.us, district43@ohr.state.oh.us, district87@ohr.state.oh.us, district62@ohr.state.oh.us, district79@ohr.state.oh.us, district19@ohr.state.oh.us, district14@ohr.state.oh.us, district06@ohr.state.oh.us, district93@ohr.state.oh.us, district59@ohr.state.oh.us, district97@ohr.state.oh.us, district74@ohr.state.oh.us, district73@ohr.state.oh.us, district50@ohr.state.oh.us, district60@ohr.state.oh.us, district65@ohr.state.oh.us, district26@ohr.state.oh.us, district58@ohr.state.oh.us, district76@ohr.state.oh.us, district71@ohr.state.oh.us, district04@ohr.state.oh.us district22@ohr.state.oh.us, district37@ohr.state.oh.us, district67@ohr.state.oh.us, district56@ohr.state.oh.us, district64@ohr.state.oh.us, district39@ohr.state.oh.us, district57@ohr.state.oh.us, district32@ohr.state.oh.us. district17@ohr.state.oh.us, district20@ohr.state.oh.us, district72@ohr.state.oh.us, district30@ohr.state.oh.us, district10@ohr.state.oh.us, district99@ohr.state.oh.us, district51@ohr.state.oh.us, district61@ohr.state.oh.us, district45@ohr.state.oh.us, district18@ohr.state.oh.us, district02@ohr.state.oh.us, district28@ohr.state.oh.us, district80@ohr.state.oh.us, district82@ohr.state.oh.us, district96@ohr.state.oh.us, district63@ohr.state.oh.us, district85@ohr.state.oh.us, district35@ohr.state.oh.us, district46@ohr.state.oh.us, district36@ohr.state.oh.us, district13@ohr.state.oh.us, district52@ohr.state.oh.us, district05@ohr.state.oh.us, district25@ohr.state.oh.us, district92@ohr.state.oh.us, district40@ohr.state.oh.us, district44@ohr.state.oh.us, district49@ohr.state.oh.us, district66@ohr.state.oh.us, district47@ohr.state.oh.us, district75@ohr.state.oh.us, district81@ohr.state.oh.us, district53@ohr.state.oh.us, district38@ohr.state.oh.us, district84@ohr.state.oh.us, district42@ohr.state.oh.us, district41@ohr.state.oh.us, district11@ohr.state.oh.us. district23@ohr.state.oh.us, district33@ohr.state.oh.us, district07@ohr.state.oh.us, district77@ohr.state.oh.us
.
.
.

Friday, June 6, 2008

A Problem With Bans (#01)

.
If we banned everything that someone didn’t like, what would be left?

What would happen if we had bans on SCENTS?

- That would put the perfume manufacturers out of business.
- It could limit many soap sales including shampoos as many gain customers from the scent in specific soaps.
- It would adversely affect chemical companies as about everything made that comes in a bottle or can is scented.
- What about natural scents like those you get when you buy a live Christmas tree? Would Christmas trees also be banned?
- Flowers and their scents would have to go too.

Now what would the 'scent ban' do to the economy?

There is one scent that will never be bottled or canned.
It’s the scent of an anti. No one would buy it.


The funny FACT is that when you ask people why they are for a smoking ban, most say, 'I don't like the smell'.

Does it seem logical to dictate adult life for everyone on 'like' due to SOME adults not having the sense to go where what they do not like isn't at?


Above being built on deceits, bans are one sided and offer NO CHOICE.


.